08 January 2010
07 January 2010
Guide to Greener Electronics ranking interactive graphic
We first released our 'Guide to Greener Electronics' in August 2006. The guide ranks the 18 top manufacturers of personal computers, mobile phones, TVs and games consoles according to their policies on toxic chemicals, recycling and climate change. Last updated: January 2010
7.3
Nokia -- Remains in first place with good scores on toxics use reduction, but loses points on energy. More...
6.9
Sony Ericsson -- Moves up with top marks on toxics elimination but weak on recycling. More...
5.3
Toshiba -- Good score on toxics elimination but needs to meet upcoming phase out commitment by March 2010. More...
5.3
Philips -- Loses points for failing to lobby for phase out of hazardous substance in legislation. More...
5.1
Apple -- Continues to improve, scoring best on eliminating toxic chemicals and e-waste criteria. More...
5.1
LG Electronics -- LG score improves, but is still penalized for postponing date for toxics phase out. More...
5.1
Sony -- Maintains overall score with better energy total, but needs to lobby for stronger chemicals legislation. More...
5.1
Motorola -- Slightly reduced score, due to lack of lobbying for stronger chemicals legislation. More...
5.1
Samsung -- Big drop due to penalty point for failing to meet commitment to phase out hazardous substances. More...
4.9
Panasonic -- Score unchanged, strongest on energy but poor on e-waste and recycling. More...
4.7
HP -- Improved position thanks to clear support for global emissions reductions, but needs to lobby for improved chemical legislation.More...
4.5
Acer -- Score unchanged but Acer is lobbying for stronger chemicals legislation.More...
4.5
Sharp -- Loses points due to poor information on toxics elimination and fails to support stronger chemicals legislation. More...
3.9
Dell -- Reduced score on energy criteria and penalty point for delaying toxics phase out till 2011.More...
3.5
Fujitsu -- Improved score due to support for global carbon emission reductions and cutting its own emissions.More...
2.5
Lenovo -- Score unchanged, with penalty point for indefinite delay on toxics phase out. More...
2.4
Microsoft -- Reduced score, fails to support strong chemicals legislation. More...
1.4
Nintendo -- Nintendo remains in last place with the same score. More...
Previous versions of the ranking in full:
Ranking criteria explained
The ranking criteria reflect the demands of the Toxic Tech campaign to the electronics companies. Our three demands are that companies should:
* Clean up their products by eliminating hazardous substances.
* Takeback and recycle their products responsibly once they become obsolete.
* Reduce the climate impacts of their operations and products.
The use of harmful chemicals in electronics prevents their safe recycling when the products are discarded. Companies scored marks out of 51 this has then been calculated to a mark out of 10 for simplicity.
Follow the more link beside each company for the full details of their score. The full criteria for scoring the companies is available. Download the full pdf of the scorecard.
Each score is based solely on public information on the companies website. Companies found not to be following their published policies will be deducted penalty point in future versions of the guide.
The guide is updated every few months. The current edition was published on January 7, 2010.
For more detailed explanation check our Q&A about the Guide to Greener Electronics.
Disclaimer: Our 'Guide to Greener Electronics' aims to clean up the electronics sector and get manufacturers to take responsibility for the full life cycle of their products, including the electronic waste that their products generate. The guide does not rank companies on labour standards, mining, or any other issues, but recognises that these are important in the production and use of electronics products. For more on the social impacts of the electronics industry visit Good Electronics and Make IT Fair.
Sursa: Greenpeace International
7.3Nokia -- Remains in first place with good scores on toxics use reduction, but loses points on energy. More...
6.9
Sony Ericsson -- Moves up with top marks on toxics elimination but weak on recycling. More...
5.3
Toshiba -- Good score on toxics elimination but needs to meet upcoming phase out commitment by March 2010. More...
5.3
Philips -- Loses points for failing to lobby for phase out of hazardous substance in legislation. More...
5.1
Apple -- Continues to improve, scoring best on eliminating toxic chemicals and e-waste criteria. More...
5.1
LG Electronics -- LG score improves, but is still penalized for postponing date for toxics phase out. More...
5.1
Sony -- Maintains overall score with better energy total, but needs to lobby for stronger chemicals legislation. More...
5.1
Motorola -- Slightly reduced score, due to lack of lobbying for stronger chemicals legislation. More...
5.1
Samsung -- Big drop due to penalty point for failing to meet commitment to phase out hazardous substances. More...
4.9
Panasonic -- Score unchanged, strongest on energy but poor on e-waste and recycling. More...
4.7
HP -- Improved position thanks to clear support for global emissions reductions, but needs to lobby for improved chemical legislation.More...
4.5
Acer -- Score unchanged but Acer is lobbying for stronger chemicals legislation.More...
4.5
Sharp -- Loses points due to poor information on toxics elimination and fails to support stronger chemicals legislation. More...
3.9
Dell -- Reduced score on energy criteria and penalty point for delaying toxics phase out till 2011.More...
3.5
Fujitsu -- Improved score due to support for global carbon emission reductions and cutting its own emissions.More...
2.5
Lenovo -- Score unchanged, with penalty point for indefinite delay on toxics phase out. More...
2.4
Microsoft -- Reduced score, fails to support strong chemicals legislation. More...
1.4
Nintendo -- Nintendo remains in last place with the same score. More...
Previous versions of the ranking in full:
Ranking criteria explained
The ranking criteria reflect the demands of the Toxic Tech campaign to the electronics companies. Our three demands are that companies should:
* Clean up their products by eliminating hazardous substances.
* Takeback and recycle their products responsibly once they become obsolete.
* Reduce the climate impacts of their operations and products.
The use of harmful chemicals in electronics prevents their safe recycling when the products are discarded. Companies scored marks out of 51 this has then been calculated to a mark out of 10 for simplicity.
Follow the more link beside each company for the full details of their score. The full criteria for scoring the companies is available. Download the full pdf of the scorecard.
Each score is based solely on public information on the companies website. Companies found not to be following their published policies will be deducted penalty point in future versions of the guide.
The guide is updated every few months. The current edition was published on January 7, 2010.
For more detailed explanation check our Q&A about the Guide to Greener Electronics.
Disclaimer: Our 'Guide to Greener Electronics' aims to clean up the electronics sector and get manufacturers to take responsibility for the full life cycle of their products, including the electronic waste that their products generate. The guide does not rank companies on labour standards, mining, or any other issues, but recognises that these are important in the production and use of electronics products. For more on the social impacts of the electronics industry visit Good Electronics and Make IT Fair.
Sursa: Greenpeace International
05 January 2010
Alege sa fii fericit acum, nu maine!
toata lumea scrie despre anul 2009 sau 2010..ma intreb daca sa fac si eu la fel.. anul 2009 s-a incheiat, asta-i clar.. ce sens mai are sa mai vorbesc de ceva ce nu mai poate fi schimbat. Anul 2010 vine ca orice "viitor" an care se respecta, cu semne de intrebare.. De ce sa vorbesc despre ele cand nu am raspunsul la ele. Ideea e ca nu ma astept de la nimic de la anul 2010; mai exact, nu simt ca as vrea ceva mai mult. Am tot ce imi trebuie. Ca vreau sa fac anumite chestii, asta da! e clar, dar daca nu se intampla, nu inseamna ca raman cu ceva in minus, ci pur si simplu o sa raman neschimbata. Tot ce imi doresc este sa invat lectiile care mi-au fost date.. sa invat din ele, ca sa pot sa avansez.. Am citit undeva ca numai ideea de a te face cineva fericit e complet gresita, ca numai noi alegem cand sa fim fericiti sau daca sa fim. Adevarul este ca in momentul cand suntem tristi, deprimati, dezorientati, suntem asa numai pentru ca i-am lasat pe ceilalti sa ne faca sa ne simtim asa. In realitate, oricine poate fi fericit chiar acum! daca vrea.. Eu incerc sa imi aduc aminte asta, si cand ma mai iau gandurile.. imi propun sa fiu fericita.. Asa ca, anul 2010 nu conteaza cum vine.. Important este cum ma simt acum si ce ma hotarasc sa simt. .. Tot ce trebuie sa facem este sa ne punem urmatoarea intrebare: "What would love do now?" .. daca ai raspunsul.. ai si linistea si fericirea ca nu iti mai trebuie nimic altceva.. raspunde cu dragoste in fata oricarei provocari, sau nu raspunde deloc..
Alege pacea..
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)